Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 15، number In Volume 7، October 2022 ، issue Number 77

Critique and classification of the views of critics of Shamloo poetry and thought

Soheila Gholaminejad , Mohammad Reza Roozbeh (Author in Charge)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Shamloo"s works and ideas, as a new poet and master of style and format in contemporary Persian literature, have a relatively wide range and familiarity with the critiques of his poetry and thought, interest Critics and critics help people with a broader vision and a more principled approach to criticism. In this article, the articles of the last two decades on the subject of criticism and analysis of poetry and thought, which have been published in scientific-research journals, as well as the index books that have criticized and analysis of poetry and thought, have been reviewed and classified. This classification determines from which perspectives Shamloo poetry can be researched and from which perspectives it has remained unknown and neglected. The present article has tried to answer the question, which type of critique has been the most approached by critics in the last two decades, and what is the reason for the abundance or quantity of types of critique of Shamloo"s poetry and thought?

METHODOLOGY: For this purpose, sixty-four scientific and research articles published in prestigious journals in the eighties and nineties and thirty-seven index books in the field of poetry including poetry using descriptive-analytical method and data collection as The library has been reviewed.

FINDINGS: In the field of articles, the amount of criticism in the nineties is twice as much as the criticism in the eighties. Of the twenty-eight articles in the eighties, eight were rhetorical critiques, four were deconstructive critiques, and the rest were mythological, psychoanalytic, and feminist critiques. In the nineties, forty-three scholarly essays have critiqued poetry and inclusive thought, with the highest proportions being comparative, rhetorical, constructivist, and reader-centered, respectively. In the field of critical books, the most critical approaches that have been welcomed by experts and researchers in this field are: integrated criticism (frequency 27%), sociological criticism (frequency 24.32%), constructivist criticism (frequency 18.92%), Aesthetic Criticism (frequency 16.22%).

CONCLUSION: The frequency of comparative, rhetorical, structuralist and structural criticism in the critiques of the last two decades shows that critics follow the latest approaches to criticism in the world and based on the new view of the world of criticism. On the other hand, there are many modern aspects in Shamloo"s poetry and the rhetoric of his poetry is western and new and is more in line with modern literary theories and has caused the exponential tendency of critics to his poetry.

Keyword
Literary Criticism , Including , Criticism classification , Reviewer , Poetry , Thought

• Abedi, Kamyar. (2014). An Introduction to Persian Poetry in the Twentieth Century, Tehran: Jahan-e-Ketab, pp. 181 and 466.
• Balal, Farzad, Gholam Hosseinzadeh, Gholam Hossein & Taheri, Ghodratollah. (2014). Review and analysis of critiques related to Shamloo, Persian Language and Literature, Sanandaj Azad University, (18) 6, pp. 1-28.
• Eagleton, Terry. (2014). An Introduction to Literary Theory, 8th Edition, Tehran: Markaz Publisher, pp. 129 and 143.
• Habib. M. A. R. (2017). Modern literary criticism and theory, translated by Sohrab Tavousi, Tehran: Contemporary View, p.22.
• Hoquqi, Mohammad. (2013). Poetry of our time, Vol. 1, 13th edition, Tehran: Negah, pp.30-31.
• Kiani, Reza, Salimi, Ali and Jabri, Susan. (2017). An Introduction to the Pathology of Contemporary Poetry in the Semantic Field of Language (with a Critical-Comparative Look at Contemporary Iranian and Iraqi Poetry), Literary Techniques, (1) 9, pp. 19- 38.
• Meqdadi, Bahram. (2014). Encyclopedia of Literary Criticism, Tehran: Cheshmeh, p.5.
• Nojoumian, Amir Ali. (2012). Towards a New Definition of Comparative Literature and Comparative Criticism, Literary Research, 9 (38), pp. 131-148.
• Qaraguzlu, Mohammad. (2003). Thus said Bamdad Khesteh, Tehran: Azadmehr.
• Qaraguzlu, Mohammad. (2005). Nazli did not speak, Tehran: Negah.
• Qaraguzlu, Mohammad. (2018). Bitter History as Narrated by Ahmad Shamloo, Tehran: Negah.
• Roozbeh, Mohammad Reza. (2008). Contemporary Iranian Literature (prose), third edition, Tehran: Roozgar, pp. 118-119.
• Shafiee Kadkani, Mohammad Reza. (2015). With lights and mirrors (in search of the roots of the evolution of contemporary Iranian poetry), fifth edition, Tehran: Sokhan, p. 516.
• Shamisa, Sirus. (2007). Literary Criticism, Tehran: Mitra, pp. 15 and 25-27.
• Shamloo, Ahmad. (2014). Sinbad in the Journey of Death, Collection of Conversations of Ahmad Shamloo, under the supervision of Aida Shamloo, Tehran: Cheshmeh, p.76.
• Tyson, Lewis. (2015). Theories of Contemporary Literary Criticism, Volume 8 of the Collection of Literary Criticism and Theory, Third Edition, Tehran: Today's Look, pp. 411 and 283.
• Vosoughi, Nasser. (2014). Persian Language and Contemporary Literature, compiled by Kamyar Abedi, Tehran: Baztabnegar, p. 253.